Reading between the
lines of Lambeth drug price data
Supply
and demand models implicitly suggest that effective
law enforcement interventions against drug shipments
create shortages which in turn lead to higher prices.
While it is widely accepted that the consumption of
chronic users is inelastic, it is hoped that shortage-induced
price hikes will deter experimenters and dissuade recreational
users. Data gathered by the Independent Drug Monitoring
Unit over the 2000-2002 period, suggests however, that
this hardly applies to the cannabis market. While the
research records considerable fluctuations for wholesale
prices, retail prices have kept steady.
The
research looked into prices for the following units:
1/8th ounce, and 9 ounces; we work on the
assumption that the first two unit costs are retail
prices, and that 9 ounce deals are the entry unit for
petty dealers.
It
was found that the average wholesale prices for cannabis
resin (9 ounces) fell from £ 446 in 2000 to £ 299, a
drop of £ 147 (33%), while retail prices for the
lowest unit in trade showed a negligible increase over
the period. The benefit of falling purchase prices was
kept by the dealers and not passed on to customers.
The converse is the case in the case of skunk sales,
where whole sale prices rose from £ 740 per 9oz in 2000
to £ 883 in 2002, increase of £ 143 (19%). End users,
however, were charged slightly less, as the price for
1/8th ounce dropped from £ 21 to £ 20.70
(2 %).
Prices
also remained steady at the higher denomination of 1
ounce. It seems that by and large, retail dealers were
absorbing losses and pocketing windfalls from wholesale
fluctuations to stabilise the market.
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
Soap
8th
|
12.90
|
12.40
|
12.90
|
Soap
1oz
|
69.90
|
61.20
|
65.70
|
Soap
9oz
|
446.00
|
394.00
|
298.75
|
Skunk
8th
|
21.10
|
20.50
|
20.70
|
Skunk
1 oz
|
122.00
|
120.00
|
125.00
|
Skunk
9 oz
|
740.00
|
641.00
|
883.00
|
Matching
these observations with qualitative research data
on the Lambeth drug scene, we suggest that they are
indicative of a growing trend in the distribution
of some classified substances.
One
of the emerging themes in the Ænormalisationà of drug
use (Parker and Measham) has been the quest for Æhassle
freeà transactions, free from fear of being victmised,
exploited or arrested. Lambeth, partly with its reputation
and entertainment venues attracts large numbers of outsiders
looking for drugs. The vibrant drug street market caters
for some of this demand, but more significant in terms
of volume are probably the large numbers of social supply
dealers not readily listed in the existing typologies.
Working
from their own premises, these new social supply dealers,
will service an irregular client base running into hundreds.
They recruit their purchasers though introduction and
never advertise their services or push their wares aggressively.
Often a range of products is on offer in addition to
cannabis, particularly MDMA, amphetamine and cocaine.
Working in a densely populated area, many work in casual
partnerships, referring customers to each other, and
bulk buying from their suppliers. Interestingly, crack
cocaine and heroin are shunned, and customers discouraged
from inquiring.
The
only criminal involvement of these social supply dealers
is the drugs trade with no cross over with, say dealing
in stolen goods, social security fraud, or credit card
fraud. Entrepreneurial activity outside the drug trade
is strictly licit, and usually in the music/entertainment
field. Most are employed, many with attractive career
prospects. Drug dealing provides a lucrative sideline,
and a lifestyle choice.
The
burgeoning demand for stable drug trading emporia and
places for consumption has also produced a diluted down
version of the Dutch coffeeshop. A retail outlet with
a legitimate front, and a drug selling back window where
herbal cannabis is sold in money units, not weights-bags
for £10, £20 or £50. At a nearby caf¸ smoking is tolerated.
Customers from all over London frequent both establishment,
with orderly queues of formally dressed office workers
forming in the early evening.
On
the basis of these preliminary results we therefore
suggest that a separation of the drug markets is in
process. The distribution of the most popular and least
stigmatised substances is being effectively detached
from the criminal scene. The implications of this trend
are profound, with on the one hand, ever wider access
to these Æsocially acceptedà drugs, while on the other
creating barriers against those that arenÃt. A different
question arises over how the law should handle the social
supply dealers.
It
seems paradoxical to arrest and convict such people,
thereby extinguishing their licit career possibilities
and effectively forcing them to fully engage with crime.
The
ongoing process of separation and self regulation in
the drug markets provide a promising beginning for the
effective regulation of the drug markets. It would be
encouraging if the Lambeth experiment could be followed
up by more constructive government engagement with the
drugs supply.